Comparison of Portal Vein Diameter in Pregnant and Non-pregnant Women in South-south Nigeria

Enefia Kelvin Kiridi

Department of Radiology, Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital, Okolobiri, Bayelsa State, Nigeria and Silhouette Radiodiagnostic Consultants, Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.

Peter Chibuzor Oriji *

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Medical Centre, Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.

Emily Gabriel Enefia Kiridi

Department of Physiology, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Amassoma, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.

Obiora Chibundu

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Asokoro District Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nile University of Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria.

Akaninyene Eseme Ubom

Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Perinatology, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria and International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), Committee on Childbirth and Postpartum Haemorrhage, Nigeria.

Obinna Isidore Onyia

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital, Okolobiri, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.

Johnpatrick Uchenna Ugwoegbu

Department of Radiology, Federal Medical Centre, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria.

Panebi Yao Bosrotsi

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Diete Koki Memorial Hospital, Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.

Abednigo Ojanerohan Addah

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital, Okolobiri, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.

Adedotun Daniel Adesina

Department of Medical Services, Nigerian Law School, Yenagoa Campus, Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, Nigeria and Oasis Public Health Consulting Ltd., Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Background: The hepatic artery is a branch of the coeliac trunk, and supplies 25% of the total blood flow to the liver, while the portal vein is formed by the mesenteric and splenic veins, and accounts for the remaining 75% of hepatic blood supply.

Objectives: To compare the portal vein diameter (PVD) in non-pregnant women with that of normal pregnant women, correlating it with age and parity.

Subjects and Methods: This comparative, cross-sectional study was conducted at all the clinical departments of the two tertiary health facilities, one secondary facility and one radiodiagnostic facility in Bayelsa State, South-South Nigeria, between April, 2022 and December, 2022. Data analysis was done using Statistical Product and Service Solutions for Windows® version 25, SPSS Inc.; Chicago, United States of America (USA). Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentages) and Pearson product moment correlation were used for the analysis. The level of significance was considered at p<0.05.

Results: The mean PVD was 10.4 ± 1.6 mm and 10.5 ± 2.0 mm, among gravid women and non-gravid women, respectively. Among gravid women, PVD ranged from 7.5 mm to 14.0 mm, while for non-gravid women, it ranged from 6.8 mm to 16.6 mm. There was no significant difference in mean PVD between the two study groups.

Conclusion: This research has established baseline normal values for normal range of PV diameter in healthy pregnant and non-pregnant women. It also revealed no correlation between PV diameter with age and parity of the women.

Keywords: Portal vein diameter, liver, non-pregnant women, pregnant women, age, parity


How to Cite

Kiridi, Enefia Kelvin, Peter Chibuzor Oriji, Emily Gabriel Enefia Kiridi, Obiora Chibundu, Akaninyene Eseme Ubom, Obinna Isidore Onyia, Johnpatrick Uchenna Ugwoegbu, Panebi Yao Bosrotsi, Abednigo Ojanerohan Addah, and Adedotun Daniel Adesina. 2023. “Comparison of Portal Vein Diameter in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women in South-South Nigeria”. International Research Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 6 (1):11-18. https://www.journalirjgh.com/index.php/IRJGH/article/view/71.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Clapp JF, Stepanchak W, Tomaselli J, Kortan M, Faneslow S. Portal vein blood flow-effects of pregnancy, gravity, and exercise. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183(1):167-172. DOI:10.1067/mob.2000.105902

Nakai A, Sekiya I, Oya A, Koshino T, Araki T. Assessment of the hepatic arterial and portal venous blood flows during pregnancy with Doppler ultrasonography. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2002;266(1):25-29. DOI:10.1007/pl00007495

Bissonnette J, Durand F, de Raucourt E, Ceccaldi PF, Plessier A, Valla D, et al. Pregnancy and vascular liver disease. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):41-50. DOI:10.1016/j.jceh.2014.12.007

Bacq Y. The Liver in Normal Pregnancy. In: Madame Curie Bioscience Database. Landes Bioscience; 2013. Accessed February 6, 2023. Available:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6005/

Mahmuud SA, Rashid SA. Doppler Ultrasound Assessment of Portal Venous Flow Changes During Pregnancy. AMJ Adv Med J Sci J Kurd High Counc Med Spec.2022;7(2):74-79. DOI:10.56056/amj.2022.181

Hawaz Y, Admassie D, Kebede T. Ultrasound Assessment of Normal Portal Vein Diameter in Ethiopians Done at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital. East Cent Afr J Surg. 2012;17(1):90-93. DOI:10.4314/ecajs.v17i1

Bolarinwa OA. Sample size estimation for health and social science researchers: The principles and considerations for different study designs. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2020;27(2):67-75. DOI:10.4103/npmj.npmj_19_20

LaMorte WW. Sample Size for One Sample, Continuous Outcome. Boston University School of Public Health. Accessed October 26, 2022.

Available:https://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/mph-modules/bs/bs704_power/BS704_Power3.html

Usman AU, Ibinaiye P, Ahidjo A, Tahir A, Sa’ad ST, Mustapha Z, et al. Determination of normal portal vein diameter on ultrasound scan among adults in northeastern Nigeria. Arch Int Surg. 2015;5(3):143. DOI:10.4103/2278-9596.167507

Goyal N, Jain N, Rachapalli V, Cochlin DL, Robinson M. Non-invasive evaluation of liver cirrhosis using ultrasound. Clin Radiol. 2009;64(11):1056-1066. DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2009.05.010

Anakwue AM, Anakwue R, Agwu KK, Idigo F, Ugwu A, Nwogu U. Sonographic Evaluation of Normal Portal Vein Diameter in Nigerians. Eur J Sci Res. 2009;36 (1):114-117.

Geleto G, Getnet W, Tewelde T. Mean Normal Portal Vein Diameter Using Sonography among Clients Coming to Radiology Department of Jimma University Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2016;26(3):

-242.

Akanni D, Alassan KS, Kiki M, Djohoun B, Tove KMS de, Sehonou J. Ultrasound Diameter of the Portal Vein to Healthy Adult in Parakou (Benin). Open J Med Imaging. 2021;11(04):145-152. DOI:10.4236/ojmi.2021.114013

Rokni-Yazdi H, Sotoudeh H. Assessment of Normal Doppler Parameters of Portal Vein and Hepatic Artery in 37 Healthy Iranian Volunteers. Iran J Radiol. 2006; (4):213-216.

Dong G, Huang XQ, Zhu YL, Ding H, Li F, Chen SY. Increased portal vein diameter is predictive of portal vein thrombosis development in patients with liver cirrhosis. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(4):289. DOI:10.21037/atm-20-4912

Saha N, Sarkar R, Singh M. Portal vein diameter in a tertiary care centre in North-East India. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2016;14(12):110-113. DOI: 10.9790/0853-14121110113

Kiridi EK, Oriji PC, Kiridi EGE, Chibundu O, Ugwoegbu JU, Onyia O. Ultrasound assessment of portal vein diameter in healthy adult women in South-South Nigeria. Asian J Res Rep Hepatol. 2023;5(1).

Oriji PC, Kiridi EK, Kiridi EGE, Chibundu O, Ugwoegbu JU, Ubom AE, et al. Sonographic assessment of maternal portal vein diameter in healthy pregnancy in South-South Nigeria. Asian J Med Health. 2023;21(2):32-41.

Stamm ER, Meier JM, Pokharel SS, Clark T, Glueck DH, Lind KE, et al. Normal main portal vein diameter measured on CT is larger than the widely referenced upper limit of 13 mm. Abdom Radiol NY. 2016; 41(10):1931-1936.

DOI:10.1007/s00261-016-0785-9

Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420-428.

DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420

Figueras F, Fernández S, Hernández-Andrade E, Gratacós E. Umbilical venous blood flow measurement: accuracy and reproducibility. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(4):587-591. DOI:10.1002/uog.5306

Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J, Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa A, Costa C. The limits of agreement and the intraclass correlation coefficient may be inconsistent in the interpretation of agreement. J Clin Epidemiol.2011;64(3):264-269. DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.010

Fernandez S, Figueras F, Gomez O, Martinez JM, Eixarch E, Comas M, et al. Intra- and interobserver reliability of umbilical vein blood flow. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28(11):999-1003. DOI:10.1002/pd.2092